Is The Undertaker truly the Best Ever?

During his time in WWE, he's seen the rise and fall of dozens if not hundreds of the most recognizable names in the business.



The Rock



Stone Cold



Bret Hart



Ken Shamrock



Mankind



Rikishi



The Big Show







The list of main-eventer names goes on and on.



A lot of people argue that Bruno Sammartino or Lou Thesz are the greatest of all legends.



But honestly, did Bruno ever defend his Title in a Hell in a Cell match?



Inferno?



Casket?



Buried Alive?



Last Ride?



Ladder?



Table?



In my opinion, Undertaker is the single largest legend in the history of professional wrestling.



Yes, he beats Hogan. He beats Hogan badly.



What are your opinions?

Is The Undertaker truly the Best Ever?
hogan was a weak technical wrester,sammartino was limited in movements and moves,stone cold was burned out fast,thesz was another era all together,the rock could have been..so where as i can see i may have to agree with you and say yes...the two who i think would have gave him a run would have been the king harley race and ric flair.....but yes you are correct
Reply:Yes
Reply:i agree with you 100%
Reply:My opinion is that anyone who agrees with you is an ***, because nobody beats Hogan. He is the greatest pro wrestler of all time. No one could get the crowd going like Hogan could--period.

It's not about wrestling ability, or gimmick matches won, or even titles held. It's all about the ability to get the people in the arena, and getting them to react to you. No one could do it better than The Hulkster. . . .
Reply:Yep I agree